Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Not available on social.ds106.us.
social.ds106.us is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This is a Mastodon sandbox for ds106 folks. Play at your own creative risk.

Administered by:

Server stats:

54
active users

social.ds106.us: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.5

#vegan

53 posts46 participants0 posts today
Public *
Sylvie 💬

Rezept für veganes rotes Fleisch, dass wirklich 1000x besser funktioniert, als alles was man im Supermarkt so findet. Man kann daraus alles mögliche machen, bis hin zu Rouladen. Ich mache meist Geschnetzeltes und schneide das fein auf und lege das aufs Brot oder werfe es am Ende in ein Gericht.

120g Rote Beete
120g Kidneybohnen
200g geräucherter Tofu

1 TL Salz, Paprika, Zwiebeln, Knoblauch

Alles zusammen in den Mixer oder pürieren.
#Rezept #vegan #Fleischersatz
Dann… (1/2)

Public
Ingrid Hoeben Ⓥ 🇧🇪

River Action wins court ruling that #chicken megafarms will have to treat their manure as industrial waste - not only will #factoryfarms in the catchment of the River Wye now face controls of their pollution of soil/rivers, but livestock operations producing manure across the #UK will now need to take responsibility for disposing of their waste in a lawful way.

A huge legal precedent in the fight against #livestock polluting soil and rivers!

#food#meat#plantbased
Public *
The Secret Life Of Plants🌱

Was alles mit typisch vegan gekoppelt wird, aber nicht #vegan bedeutet:

Gesunde Ernährung
Ungesunde Ernährung
Teure Ernährung
Billige Ernährung

Man kann auch vegan ungesund von Chips und Limonade leben.
Ebenso billigen Pflanzenkäse kaufen.
Man kann sehr gesund vegan leben.
Man kann teuer vegan leben, oder preiswert gesund vegan leben.

Es ist keine Diät und auch kein hipper Trend.

(Genauso kann man ungesund #karnistisch leben und trotzdem sehr teuren Käse und teure Wurst kaufen.
Man kann auch gesund karnistisch leben.)

Beispiel: Äthiopisches Essen, viele Hülsenfrüchte, Gemüse, Vollkornbrot.
Public *
anlomedad

Important piece in the puzzle #RCPcollapse

nature.com/articles/s41893-020
or trophiccascades.forestry.orego ,
"The carbon opportunity cost of animal-sourced food production on land" #Hayek et al 2021
When all animal pasture and crop land currently in use for animal agriculture are rewilded, the process removes a total of
358 to 743 GtCO2 from the atmosphere by year 2050.

-743 Gt CO2, that's the theoretical equivalent of 0.5°C. ^^

The CO2 removal is based on the biomes originally covering the land nowadays in use for animal agriculture.

Ecosystem soil and litter could remove an additional 225GtCO2, "but this estimate is highly uncertain".

Albedo changes were not included in their modelling; but they say, regrowth of temperate forest systems increase temperature locally – but globally, they net cool despite albedo loss.

"Carbon uptake saturates after around 25 years for tropical forests
and around 30 years for temperate forests." Good to know. I had guesstimated this takes 60 years.

From what I can see, they computed only the rewilding process, not the CO2-equivalents GHG emissions like CH4 and NO2.
But reductions in those are maybe balanced by increased microbe activity via changes in hydrological cycle. So I won't bet on additional temperature decrease from them.

My proposed #RCPcollapse scenario research has to include rewilding in all the settlements and agriculture land in the highly tech-dependent societies, and in cities in all societies.

Also, outgassing from land and ocean once CO2 concentration drops reduces the effective atmospheric drawdown from 743Gt to 558Gt CO2.
Still -0.4°C.

-0.4°C within 30 years or so.... from the end to animal agriculture alone.ß!
Shocking. But to remind myself: from 2005 to 2020, global °C rose by 0.4°C.

Figure 1 from the paper showing a global map with all land highlighted that are currently in use for animal agriculture. Caption: Distribution of carbon in potential vegetation in areas of present-day animal feed croplands and pastures combined for each 5 arcmin grid cell. Colour corresponds to the product of land area presently under cultivation multiplied by the potential vegetation carbon density, minus the quantity presently stored in agricultural vegetation. Brazil and Ecuador, Mexico and East USA stand out, then all of central Europe and UK with Ireland, tropical and equatorial Africa, and China.
Figure 3 from the paper is a bar chart with whiskers. Since their focus was on dietary shifts within a continued civilisation, they modelled the CO2 impact from 3 different diets. Business as usual emits about 100Gt by year 2050. The "EatLancet" diet sequesters 300 Gt. The vegan diet removes the quoted 358 to 743 Gt. Caption: "Cumulative changes in terrestrial carbon from three dietary scenarios in 2050: BAU, ELC and VGN. Scenarios do not include abated emissions associated with agricultural production. Positive CO2 indicates a loss of ecosystem vegetation carbon and emissions to the atmosphere; negative indicates CO2 removal via vegetation growth. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals, reflecting various estimates of potential vegetation and distributions of cropland removal from low- and high-carbon biomes."
#FridaysForFuture#rewilding#vegan
Public
Plotting and penning

Since I'm new to the wandering.shop, moved over from home.social, I guess a new #introduction is in order. I'm a writer of fiction: mystery/suspense, science fiction, fantasy, and whatever strikes my fancy! I'm currently training to be a book coach to help people through all the things, so they don't spend years figuring it out like I did. I enjoy #nature, #science, #hiking, #biking, and #vegan #cooking and #baking. Oh, also #art and #architecture.

ExploreLive feeds
About